Marvin Sumner, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr., Defendant-appellee, 958 F.2d 369 (4th Cir. 1992)Annotate this Case
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CA-91-387-R).
Marvin Sumner, Appellant pro se.
Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for Appellee.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Marvin Sumner appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sumner v. Jackson, No. CA-91-387-R (E.D. Va. Jan. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.