Wiley G. Ouzts, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Jack M. Valpey, Doctor, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 952 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted Nov. 7, 1991. Decided Dec. 20, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. (CA-90-838-3-3J), G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

Wiley G. Ouzts, appellant pro se.

William Henry Davidson, II, Nauful & Ellis, P.A., Columbia, S.C., for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Wiley G. Ouzts appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ouzts v. Valpey, CA-90-838-3-3J (D.S.C. Sept. 10, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.