John Reeves-bey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.t. Hadden, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 396 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (CA-90-480-CRT-H; CA-90-481-HC-F), Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.
John Reeves-Bey, appellant pro se.
Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
John Reeves-Bey appeals from the district court's order denying relief in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988)/habeas corpus action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment. Reeves-Bey v. Hadden, Nos. CA-90-480-CRT-H; CA-90-481-HC-F (E.D.N.C. July 12, 1991). We deny Reeves-Bey's Motion for "Removal From Custody of the Federal B.O.P." and his "Motion for Habeas Corpus Action Challenging My Confinement in a Mental Institution Be Joined to & Heard Along with the Current Action Pending Against Defendants." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.