Richard C. Nicholson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Samuel K. Skinner, Defendant-appellee, 952 F.2d 1397 (6th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 952 F.2d 1397 (6th Cir. 1991) Dec. 2, 1991

Before DAVID A. NELSON and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

The plaintiff appeals an order granting partial summary judgment for the defendant in this action to compel enforcement of an agency decision. The district court advises that the plaintiff has claims which are still pending in the district court.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, courts of appeals have jurisdiction only over final decisions of the district court. A judgment is final if it leaves nothing remaining for the district court to do except execute final judgment. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). See Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company, 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir. 1973) (per curiam). Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir. 1978) (per curiam). Upon review and consideration the court concludes that the plaintiff's appeal must be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Rule 9(b) (1), Local Rules of the Sixth Circuit. This order is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to perfect a timely appeal upon entry of final judgment in the district court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.