Nelly Uribe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Los Angeles Police Department; Darryl Gates, Police Chief;county of Los Angeles; Ronald W. Reagan, Former Presidentof the United States; Nancy Reagan, Former 1st Lady;george Bush, President, of the United States; Dan Quayle,vice President, of the United States, et al., Defendants-appellees.nelly Uribe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Los Angeles Police Department; Ronald W. Reagan, Formerpresident of the United States; Nancy Reagan, Former 1stlady; George Bush, President, of the United States; Danquayle, Vice President, of the United States, et al.,defendants-appellees, 951 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1991)

Before SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge.^** 

MEMORANDUM^*** 

After the district court allowed Uribe to amend her original complaint, she filed two more; these complaints, like the first, do not contain a "short and plain statement of the claim" as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (2) and therefore do not provide fair notice. See Jones v. Community Redevelopment Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the complaint with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 471 (2d Cir. 1978).

The district court also required Uribe to obtain leave from the court before filing any new actions. Before imposing such a limitation, a court must give notice, create an adequate record for review and make substantive findings of frivolousness; furthermore, the court must narrowly tailor its order. De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147-48 (9th Cir. 1990). The district court here did not comply with these requirements. We therefore vacate this portion of the district court's order; if on remand the court wishes to impose a limitation on Uribe's right to bring new suits, it first must make findings in accord with De Long.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.