United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Dagoberto Munoz-vicuna, Defendant-appellant, 947 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1991)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 947 F.2d 952 (9th Cir. 1991) Submitted Oct. 8, 1991. *Decided Oct. 30, 1991

Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to support appellant's conviction. The government introduced into evidence a certified copy of appellant's deportation letter and an executed warrant of deportation, as well as oral testimony establishing that appellant reentered the country following deportation. On the basis of this evidence, a rational jury could have inferred that appellant left the United States and reentered without authorization. See United States v. Hernandez-Rojas, 617 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 864 (1980).

We affirm the conviction.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.