Irene O'connell Kruse, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Court of Appeal of the State of California for the Firstappellate District, William A. Newsom; John T. Racanelli,in Their Individual and Official Capacities As Members Ofdivision One of the Said Court of Appeal; Superior Court Ofthe State of California for the County of Sonoma; Winslowchristian; Bank of America National Trust & Savingsassociations; Leland Parachini, Steinberg Flinn, Matzger &melnick; David B. Flinn, Defendants-appellees.irene O'connell Kruse, Plaintiff,andfrederick Watson Appellant, v. Court of Appeal of the State of California for the Firstappellate District, William A. Newsom; John T. Racanelli,in Their Individual and Official Capacities As Members Ofdivision One of the Said Court of Appeal; Superior Court Ofthe State of California for the County of Sonoma; Winslowchristian; Bank of America National Trust & Savingsassociation; Leland Parachini, Steinberg Flinn, Matzger &melnick; David B. Flinn, Defendants-appellees.irene O'connell Kruse, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Court of Appeal of the State of California for the Firstappellate District, William A. Newsom; John T. Racanelli,in Their Individual and Official Capacities As Members Ofdivision One of the Said Court of Appeal; Superior Court Ofthe State of California for the County of Sonoma; Winslowchristian; Bank of America National Trust & Savingsassociation; Leland Parachini, Steinberg Flinn, Matzger &melnick; David B. Flinn, Defendants-appellees, 947 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1991)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 947 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1991) Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 1991. Decided Oct. 24, 1991

Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

The appellants' motion for leave to file a late Amended

Reply Brief is granted.

We affirm the judgment and the imposition of sanctions for

the reasons stated by the trial judge in her memorandum and

orders below. Furthermore, we award double costs on appeal

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1912

and Fed. R. App. P. 38.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.