Virginia Gilbert, Personal Representative of the Estate Ofraymond L. Gilbert, Deceased, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants,nina Marie Moon; William J. Pratt; Tonya S. Segorski;claimants-appellees,juanita Gilbert; Tamela Gilbert-keating; Timothy Gilbert,claimants-appellants, 947 F.2d 944 (6th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 947 F.2d 944 (6th Cir. 1991) Nov. 6, 1991

Before KEITH and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and TIMBERS, Senior Circuit Judge.* 


ORDER

This case from the State of Michigan arises from the diversity based wrongful death action of Raymond L. Gilbert who contracted mesothelioma and died as a result of his exposure to asbestos. The parties have moved to waive oral argument. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Raymond Gilbert's estate, his surviving spouse, his biological children from his first marriage and his step-children from his second marriage made claims to a portion of the settlement proceeds received as a result of the wrongful death action. The district court ordered a distribution of the settlement proceeds pursuant to Michigan's wrongful death statute. Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 600.2922(6) (West 1986).

On appeal, the biological children argue that the district court erred by not awarding enough money to them, by awarding too much to the surviving spouse, and by failing to calculate the present value of each award.

Upon review, we find no error. The district court's division of the proceeds was not clearly erroneous. Fed. R. Civ. P. 52; see Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573 (1985).

Accordingly, we hereby affirm the order of distribution dated November 21, 1990. Rule 9(b) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable William H. Timbers, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.