Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Leif D. Soderling, Jay S. Soderling, Defendants-appellants, 946 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore WILLIAM A. NORRIS and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, District Judge** .
MEMORANDUM***
Leif and Jay Soderling appeal the district court's order denying their motion to dissolve two preliminary injunctions and to terminate a receivership. In a related appeal (No. 90-15442), we addressed the validity of the issuance of the injunctions and the appointment of the receiver.
We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court's refusal to dissolve the injunctions because the Soderlings have failed to present new circumstances that were not addressed in the related appeal. Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc., 739 F.2d 1415, 1418 n. 4 (9th Cir. 1984) (denial of motion to dissolve injunction is "appealable only if the motion raises new matter not considered when the injunction was first issued.")
With regard to the district court's refusal to terminate the receivership, the Soderlings raise the same arguments that we have resolved against them in the related appeal.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
The Honorable Fred Van Sickle, United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
