Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Rodney James Hann, Defendant-appellant, 945 F.2d 407 (7th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore EASTERBROOK and KANNE, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
Order
Rodney James Hann contends that the district judge erred in declining to depart downward from the sentence prescribed by the Sentencing Guidelines in this case. We lack jurisdiction to review that contention. United States v. Franz, 886 F.2d 973 (7th Cir. 1989).
Hann's other contention is that U.S.S.G. 3D1.2 requires the grouping of his offenses for purposes of determining a guideline range. United States v. Bruder, No. 90-1931 (7th Cir. Sept. 27, 1991) (in banc), resolves that question in Hann's favor. The sentence is accordingly vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing consistent with Bruder.
Judge Kanne dissents for the reasons stated in Judge Flaum's dissenting opinion in Bruder.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
