United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Phillip Bernard Kane, A/k/a Ghost, Defendant-appellant, 945 F.2d 398 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 945 F.2d 398 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted March 29, 1991. Decided Oct. 1, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-507-H; CA-90-1097)

Phillip Bernard Kane, appellant pro se.

Catherine Curtis Blake, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Phillip Bernard Kane appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kane, CR-85-507-H; CA-90-1097 (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.