Harold C. Banks, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Palo Alto, et al., Defendant-appellee.harold C. Banks, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Palo Alto, et al., Defendant-appellee, 944 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 944 F.2d 908 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Sept. 10, 1991. *Decided Sept. 12, 1991. As Amended April 2, 1992

Before CANBY and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN, District Judge.** 

MEMORANDUM*** 

The district judge gave appellant detailed statements of pleading deficiencies and instructions on how to rectify them. He dismissed the case only when it was absolutely clear that the complaint could not be cured by amendment. Noll v Carlson, 809 F2d 1446 (9th Cir1987).

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

The Honorable William Fremming Nielsen, United States District Judge, Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation

 ***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.