Charles Chapman Thamer, Ii, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Neighbors, Respondent-appellee, 943 F.2d 58 (10th Cir. 1991)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - 943 F.2d 58 (10th Cir. 1991) Sept. 4, 1991

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* 

Before McKAY, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.

There is no allegation that the defendant was required to proceed to trial in his prison uniform,1  and in the absence of any such allegation, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the District Court's Order of February 28, 1991, including the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate filed January 31, 1991.

 *

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

 1

As best as can be determined from the record, his complaint is that he was required to appear in prison garb at the preliminary hearing

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.