Randolph W. Ringstad, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Carlyle Steele, Attorney at Law, Lawrence Crane, Solicitor,ben Brown, Deputy Sheriff, Millie Ridgeway, Deputysheriff, Caroline Mattos, Clerk,defendants-appellees,andluis Kutner, Attorney at Law, Stephen John Henry, Attorneyat Law, Robert H. Cureton, Judge, William H.ballenger, Judge, Defendants, 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 941 F.2d 1207 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted Feb. 14, 1991. Decided Aug. 16, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Clyde H. Hamilton, District Judge. (CA-89-1174-15K)

Randolph Willis Ringstad, appellant pro se.

Edwin Brown Parkinson, Jr., Haynsworth, Marion, Mckay & Guerard, James D. Brice, Rainey, Britton, Gibbes & Clarkson, Greenville, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:


Randolph W. Ringstad appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ringstad v. Steele, CA89-1174-15K (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.