United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph Allen Carl, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 936 F.2d 567 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-86-298)
Joseph Allen Carl, Jr., appellant pro se.
Edward Bart Daniel, United States Attorney, Columbia, S.C., for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Allen Carl Jr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Carl, CR-86-298 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 1991). The appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
