Unpublished Dispositionanita Mason, Individually and As Personal Representative Ofthe Estate of Harlan Clay Mason, Deceased,plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Detroit, City of Detroit Police Department, Williamhart, and Gary Chapman, Defendants-appellees, 935 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 935 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1991) June 13, 1991

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge.* 

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff, Anita Mason, appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants, the City of Detroit and Gary Chapman.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendants have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its memorandum opinion and order dated June 4, 1990.

 *

The Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation