Clarence Sutton, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Warden, Maryland House Ofcorrection, Respondents-appellees, 934 F.2d 320 (4th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 934 F.2d 320 (4th Cir. 1991) Submitted Jan. 2, 1991. Decided May 28, 1991

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CA-88-2031-HM)

Clarence Sutton, appellant pro se.

Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, John Joseph Curran, Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D. Md.


Before PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.


Clarence Sutton appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sutton v. United States, CA-88-2031-HM (D. Md. Sept. 7, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.