Unpublished Disposition, 925 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir. 1991)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 925 F.2d 1472 (9th Cir. 1991)

Abraham T. YANG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Dianne FEINSTEIN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-15864.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.* Decided Feb. 6, 1991.

Before TANG, SCHROEDER and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

Abraham T. Yang appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motion to set aside a judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the denial of a 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion. Thompson v. Housing Auth. of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 832 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 829 (1986).

The district court's order dismissing Yang's action addressed the statute of limitations issue in detail. Yang's Rule 60(b) motion merely reiterated his previously rejected arguments. Thus, there was no abuse of discretion in denying that motion and we affirm the dismissal of this action based on the analysis set forth in the district court's well-reasoned order.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.