In Re Curtis L. Wrenn, Petitioner, 923 F.2d 850 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseOn Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. (CA-82-2044-HAR)
Curtis L. Wrenn, petitioner pro se.
PETITION DENIED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Wrenn brought this petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the district court had unduly delayed acting on his employment discrimination action. Because significant pleadings have been filed with the district court within the last six months,* we hold that the district court has not unduly delayed acting on Wrenn's action. Therefore, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Wrenn filed a renewed motion for summary judgment on September 28, 1990, after the Supreme Court denied his petition for writ of certiorari in a related action
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
