Unpublished Disposition, 921 F.2d 282 (9th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseRandal N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.George DEEDS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-16021.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 31, 1990.* Decided Dec. 20, 1990.
Before TANG, FLETCHER and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order entered by the district court is not a final order. It reads: "Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice." See California v. Harrier, 700 F.2d 1217, 1218 (9th Cir. 1983).
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
