Reginald Vann Rucker, Petitioner-appellant, v. Gary T. Dixon, Warden, Attorney General of North Carolina,respondents-appellees, 920 F.2d 927 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 920 F.2d 927 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Dec. 3, 1990. Decided Dec. 18, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-89-919-G)

Reginald Vann Rucker, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Reginald Vann Rucker seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rucker v. Dixon, CA-89-919-G (M.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.