Lemuel Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr., Chairman, Defendant-appellee, 918 F.2d 173 (4th Cir. 1990)Annotate this Case
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. CA-90-396)
Lemuel Johnson, appellant pro se.
Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Lemuel Johnson appeals from the magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.* Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate. Johnson v. Jackson, CA-90-396 (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)