Aurelio Varela, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J.j. Clark, Warden; H.c. Tarleton, D.h.o.; J. Irizarry;stephen S. Dollar, S.o.s.; S. Rhoads, Former Unit Manager;j. Randall, Counselor; John Doe, Segregation Reviewofficer; Gary M. Cimock, Paralegal; Walter Signal, Formerfood Service Administrator; Bryant, Food Service Assistanceadministrator; Mccay, Food Service Assistant Administrator;lieutenant Bowyer, Defendants-appellees, 917 F.2d 558 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 917 F.2d 558 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Oct. 1, 1990. Decided Nov. 2, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Dec. 11, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-88-674-N, CA-88-675-N)

Aurelio Varela, appellant pro se.

J. Phillip Krajewski, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellees.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Aurelio Varela appeals from the district court's order denying relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Varela's motion for an injunction and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Varela v. Clark, CA-88-674-N, CA-88-675-N (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 1989; May 23, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.