Unpublished Dispositionelliott Estes Hickman, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Respondent-appellee, 917 F.2d 557 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 917 F.2d 557 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Oct. 1, 1990. Decided Nov. 1, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-1356-N)

Elliott Estes Hickman, appellant pro se.

Katherine Baldwin Toone, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Elliott Estes Hickman seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 because of procedural default. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.*  Hickman v. Murray, CA-90-1356-N (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

 *

We find no cause excusing petitioner's default in the state habeas process

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.