Rosemarie Christophersen, Surviving Spouse of Albert Roychristophersen, Deceased and Steven Roychristophersen, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Allied-signal Corporation, Inco Alloys International, Inc.,united Catalysts, Inc., the Hall Chemical Company,marathon Manufacturing Company, and Cpchemicals, Inc., Defendants-appellees, 914 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 914 F.2d 66 (5th Cir. 1990) Sept. 25, 1990

Paul Colley, Jr., Law Offices of Paul Colley, Jr., Tyler, Tex., Christophersen, et al.

Steve Schoettmer, P. Jefferson Ballew, Thompson & Knight, Dallas, Tex., for Allied-Signal, Inc.

Marc A. Sheiness, Hirsch, Glover, Robinson & Sheiness, Houston, Tex., for Inco Alloys Intern'l, Inc.

Pat Beard, Beard & Kultgen, Waco, Tex., for United Catalysts, Inc.

Michael W. Huddleston, Teresa Bohne, Stan Thiebaud, R. Brent Cooper, Cowles & Thompson, Dallas, Tex., for Hall Chemical Co.

Clifton T. Hutchison, Hughes & Luce, James J. Juneau, Strasburger & Price, Dallas, Tex., for Marathon Manuf.

Jeff Kinsel, Elizabeth S. Miller, Frederick deB. Bostwick, III, Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, Waco, Tex., for CP Chemicals, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Walter Smith, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 4, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 902 F.2d 362)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, KING, JOHNSON, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.* 


BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

 *

Judge Politz is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.