Petra U. Mangaoang, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondent, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 914 F.2d 271 (Fed. Cir. 1990) Aug. 14, 1990

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge

DECISION

PER CURIAM.


Petra U. Mangaoang appeals a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) affirming a decision of the Office of Personnel Management which held that Ms. Mangaoang was not entitled to a lump-sum payment of death benefits upon the death of her brother, Robert L. Ulat. Mangaoang v. Office of Personnel Management, Docket No. SE08318910087, slip op. (MSPB April 11, 1989). The Administrative Judge's decision became final December 7, 1989, upon denial of review by the full Board. 5 C.F.R. Sec. 1201.113(b) (1989). We affirm.

OPINION

Ms. Mangaoang had the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that she had met the statutory requirements for entitlement to statutory benefits under 5 U.S.C. § 8342(f) (1988). See Huskey v. Office of Personnel Management, 27 M.S.P.R. 363, 365 (1985), aff'd 790 F.2d 92 (Fed. Cir. 1986).

Ms. Mangaoang failed to meet that burden because she was unable to prove that the named beneficiary, Doroito Ulat, was deceased at the time of her brother's death, so as to entitle her to the lump sum payment as next-of-kin to her brother, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8342(c) (1988).

We find that the Board properly applied the order of precedence set forth in section 8342(c) and that its decision to deny Ms. Mangaoang's claim was supported by substantial evidence. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (1988); Phillips v. United States Postal Serv., 695 F.2d 1389, 1390 (Fed. Cir. 1982).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.