Unpublished Disposition, 914 F.2d 262 (9th Cir. 1990)Annotate this Case
Jerald Clarence CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 18, 1990.* Decided Sept. 21, 1990.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and HUG and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
Jerald Clarence Cunningham, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Cunningham's complaint alleged that the Nevada statute dealing with parole eligibility for sex offenders is unconstitutional. The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and granted leave to amend.1 Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court did not issue a final, appealable order. See Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi, 741 F.2d 1169, 1171 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1984) (" [o]rdinarily an order dismissing a complaint but not dismissing the action is not appealable under section 1291"). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for disposition without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3