Charles Thomas Locklear, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, James E. Johnson, Sgt. Hudderson, T.c.barksdale, Sgt. Staton, R.t. Morris, Michaelshupe, Jan Catbagan, Ruth Johnson,defendants-appellees, 914 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-87-105-L; CA-87-115-L)
Charles Thomas Locklear, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Thomas Locklear appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Locklear v. Murray, CA-87-105-L, CA-87-115-L (W.D. Va. Dec. 7, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
