In Re: Roger Zaczek, Petitioner, 914 F.2d 1493 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 914 F.2d 1493 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Aug. 27, 1990. Decided Sept. 25, 1990

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.

Roger Zaczek, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Roger Zaczek, a Virginia prisoner, brought this petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district judge to recuse himself. Zaczek contends that recusal is warranted because the district judge has unduly delayed acting on his motion for recusal filed in the district court, as well as that the judge has unduly delayed acting on the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition pending before him.

Recusal is only appropriate when the petitioner has made a showing of extrajudicial bias. In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987), citing United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 (1966), and Shaw v. Martin, 733 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir. 1984). Zaczek has not shown any bias arising outside of the litigation; rather, the basis for his motion for recusal is the district court's failure to act in what he believes is a timely fashion. Zaczek's allegation of delay is not sufficient to warrant an order directing the district judge to recuse himself. Therefore, the petition is denied.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.