Pedro M. Reyes, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 909 F.2d 1495 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore MAYER, Circuit Judge, JACK R. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
DECISION
JACK R. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
The MSPB's decision is affirmed.
OPINION
This is another case where an applicant for benefits under the Civil Service Retirement Act has been found by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) to not have sufficient evidence to sustain his burden of proof. See Cheeseman v. OPM, 791 F.2d 138, 141 (Fed. Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1037 (1987).
We note particularly that Petitioner has not furnished proof that retirement deductions, required by the law (5 U.S.C. § 8334(a)), have been taken from his pay. Further, he has not shown wherein the MSPB decision is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law or unsupported by substantial evidence.
Finally, Petitioner has not produced evidence showing that he had five years of creditable civilian service with the United States Government, as required by the Civil Service Retirement Act. See Sabado v. Office of Personnel Management, No. 90-3106, slip op. (Fed. Cir. June 12, 1990).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.