Unpublished Disposition, 909 F.2d 1489 (9th Cir. 1990)

No. 90-70103.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 6, 1990.

Before SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAM J. REA,^*  District Judge.

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Petitioners have not demonstrated that adequate relief will be unavailable on appeal. See Organization For Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, 828 F.2d 536, 542 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1987) ("there is no prospect of irreparable harm from payment of ... fees ... because the money paid can be recouped"). Further, petitioners have not shown that the other factors set forth in Bauman v. United States District Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977) weigh in favor of granting the "extraordinary remedy" of writ of mandamus. Mandamus relief, therefore, is not appropriate. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 108 S. Ct. 1133, 1143 (1988).

WRIT DENIED.