Unpublished Disposition, 908 F.2d 976 (9th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 908 F.2d 976 (9th Cir. 1990)

No. 88-7337.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Before JAMES R. BROWNING and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges and ORRICK,*  District Judge

MEMORANDUM** 

Upon due consideration, we affirm the disallowance of deductions under 26 U.S.C. § 174 and the imposition of additions to tax under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6653 and 6621 for the reasons set forth in the Tax Court's carefully considered opinion.

We also reject Petitioners-Appellants' contention that the Tax Court abused its discretion when it refused to "conduct additional proceedings on the issue on (sic) whether the Commissioner had in effect bought Mr. Aronson's testimony" by settling its case against him. Both Aronson and the Commissioner's counsel asserted at trial that the only agreement between them was for Aronson to pay a certain deficiency amount and to tell the truth. Taxpayers' counsel then agreed that this testimony disposed of the matter. There was no abuse of discretion.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.