Unpublished Dispositionconsolidated Grain & Barge Company, Petitioner, v. James D. Sandlin, et al., Respondents, 905 F.2d 1537 (6th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore KEITH and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Defendants seek permission to bring an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) of the district court's order denying defendant Consolidated Grain & Barge Company's motion for summary judgment on grounds that a question of fact is presented concerning whether the plaintiff is a Seaman pursuant to the Jones Act, 41 U.S.C. § 688. The plaintiff has filed a response opposing interlocutory review.
Upon consideration of this matter, we conclude that interlocutory review of the question certified is not appropriate. See Cardwell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Company, 504 F.2d 444, 446 (6th Cir. 1974). It is ORDERED that the petitions for permission to appeal be denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
