Richard M. Hull, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.l. Lewis & Company, Inc., Defendant-appellee, 905 F.2d 1529 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-252-R)
Richard M. Hull, appellant pro se.
Robert Cornelius Wood, III, Edmunds & Williams, Lynchburg, Va., for appellee.
W.D. Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard M. Hull noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
