Unpublished Dispositionmansour Guity, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Defendant-appellee, 904 F.2d 707 (6th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseBefore KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges and PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff, Mansour Guity, appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Tennessee Valley Authority.
Having had the benefit of oral argument and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant.
As the reasons why judgment should be entered for defendant have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set out by that court in its Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 1989.
The Honorable Patrick J. Duggan, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
