United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Benjamin Frank Fairley, Defendant-appellant, 900 F.2d 256 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 900 F.2d 256 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted: March 5, 1990. Decided: March 21, 1990. Rehearing Denied April 25, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-429-5-CIV; CR No. 87-27-5-CR)

Benjamin Frank Fairley, appellant pro se.

Rocco Joseph deGrasse, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Benjamin Frank Fairley appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.*  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fairley, CA-89-429-5-CIV; CR-87-27-5-CR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

We interpret Fairley's claims attacking the execution of his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.