Frankie Mccoy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ms. Supple, Assistant Warden; Major Thompson; Sergeantpeguese; D. Crest, Defendants-appellees, 900 F.2d 253 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 85-3351-HM)
Frankie McCoy, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Frankie McCoy appeals from the district court's denial of his Fed R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of a decision holding that McCoy was not subjected to administrative segregation without due process. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that the district court's decision was not an abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCoy v. Supple, C/A No. 85-3351-HM (D. Md. Dec. 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
