Bernard Thomas Church, Plaintiff-appellant, v. H.l. Thomas, Jr.; Claude Lynch; Mark Engelke, Correctionalofficer, Defendants-appellees.bernard Thomas Church, Plaintiff-appellant, v. C.r. Webb; W.p. Robinson, Jr., Defendants-appellees, 900 F.2d 250 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 900 F.2d 250 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Sept. 27, 1989. Decided March 9, 1990

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, United States Magistrate. (CA Nos. 88-590-R, 88-602-R).

Bernard Thomas Church, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

W.D. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Bernard Thomas Church noted these appeals outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). We consolidate these actions for appeal. The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider these cases. We therefore dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.