Unpublished Dispositionalfreda Packard, Plaintiff-appellant,pete A. Packard, Plaintiff, v. Mahoning County Sheriff's Department, Eugene Fox, Attorney,defendants-appellees, 895 F.2d 1414 (6th Cir. 1990)

Before KRUPANSKY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge^* .

ORDER

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant has appealed from the magistrate's denial of pauper status. Magistrates lack authority to deny motions for pauper status. Woods v. Dahlberg, case nos. 89-3991/3992 (6th Cir.Jan. 9, 1990) (per curiam).

It is ORDERED that the case is remanded to the district court for a decision by the district judge as to whether pauper status should be denied. The remand is without prejudice to any right to appeal in the event pauper status is denied.