Dan Ames, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Daniel Summey; Jerry Dagenhart; Douglas James Hudson,defendants-appellees, 892 F.2d 1041 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 892 F.2d 1041 (4th Cir. 1990)

Submitted: Oct. 30, 1989. Decided Nov. 29, 1989. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Jan. 2, 1990


Dan Ames, appellant pro se.

Walter Clement Carpenter, Howe & Waters, PA; Edwin Ray Groce, Stepp, Groce & Cosgrove, for appellees.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Dan Ames appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ames v. Summey, CA-87-223-A-C (W.D.N.C. July 5, 1989).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.