Die-matic Tool Company, Appellant, v. the United States, Appellee, 889 F.2d 1100 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Die-Matic Tool Company appeals from the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (board), ASBCA No. 31185, 89-1 BCA (CCH) p 21,342 (October 20, 1988), sustaining the contracting officer's denial of Die-Matic's claim for an equitable adjustment to its contract price. We have considered each of Die-Matic's arguments, but are unpersuaded that the board's decision is fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or unsupported by substantial evidence. See 41 U.S.C. § 609(b) (1982); Erickson Air Crane Co. v. United States, 731 F.2d 810, 814 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the board's opinion.