Refac International, Ltd., Plaintiff-appellant. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., Defendants-appellees,brico International Corporation, et al., Defendants/cross-appellants, 889 F.2d 1099 (Fed. Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 889 F.2d 1099 (Fed. Cir. 1989) Sept. 29, 1989

Before FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.


ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties' proposed briefing schedule and other motions,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The briefing schedule is as follows:

(a) November 7, 1989--"Sheldon & Mak" appellees' brief of no more than 40 pages; "Poms, Smith" appellees' brief of no more than 40 pages; "Sheldon & Mak" cross-appellants' brief of no more than 40 pages; "Poms, Smith" cross-appellants' brief of no more than 40 pages.

(b) 15 days after service--any notice of joinder by other appellees and cross-appellants or appellee's briefs of no more than 10 pages.

(c) 40 days after service--appellant's brief of no more than 50 pages.

(d) 14 days after service--"Sheldon & Mak" cross-appellants' brief of no more than 25 pages; "Poms, Smith" cross-appellants' brief of no more than 25 pages.

(2) Brico's unopposed motion to dismiss appeal no. 89-1663 is granted.

cc: Surjit P. Sigh Soni, Esq.

Thomas M. Small, Esq.

Joseph W. Price, Esq.

Gary A. Clark, Esq.

Schigeru Watanabe, Esq.

Richard P. Berg, Esq.

Paul R. Wylie, Esq.

Thomas S. Kerrigan, Esq.

Richard F.X. Clair, Esq.

Micheal W. Binning, Esq.

Grant L. Hubbard, Esq.

Richard E. Alexander, Esq.

Neil R. O'Halon, Esq.

Victor A. Rogers, Esq.

James R. Martin, Esq.

Erin T.S. Chung, Esq.

Richard G. Blair, Esq.

James A. Henricks, Esq.

Julia Holm Azarel, Esq.

Laurence H. Pretty, Esq.

Vern Schooley, Esq.

Barbara A. Reeves, Esq.

William J. Robinson, Esq.

James A. Goodman, Esq.

John F. Kraetzer, Esq.

Roger E. Hawkins, Esq.

Jerome L. Levine, Esq.

Philip C. Larschan, Esq.

Philip J. Anderson, Esq.

Maurice Wainer, Esq.

Warren J. Soloski, Esq.

Albert F. Padley, III, Esq.

Lawrence E. Picone, Esq.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.