Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul Lawrence Gore, Defendant-appellant, 889 F.2d 1089 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 889 F.2d 1089 (6th Cir. 1989) Nov. 20, 1989

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD H. JOHNSTONE, Chief District Judge* .

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellee's motion to dismiss. Appellant has failed to respond.

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed on September 12, 1989, from the order denying a presentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Such an order is not a final appealable order. The judgment and commitment order is the final judgment for purposes of an appeal in criminal cases. Berman v. United States, 302 U.S. 211, 212 (1937); United States v. Bratcher, 833 F.2d 69, 71 (6th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 108 S. Ct. 760 (1988). The collateral order exception to the finality rule as set forth in Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949) does not apply to orders denying withdrawal of a guilty plea. See United States v. Bratcher, 833 F.2d at 72.

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 8, Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

 *

The Honorable Edward H. Johnstone, Chief U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.