Thomas David Mathis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Salem, Virginia Police Department, Sergeant Hess, Officerharth, Defendants-appellees, 888 F.2d 1386 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseThomas David Mathis, appellant pro se.
James Walter Hopper, Parvin, Wilson, Barnett & Hopper, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas David Mathis appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mathis v. Hess, C/A No. 88-403-R (W.D. Va. June 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
