Unpublished Dispositionhoward Porter, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ball Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 886 F.2d 1316 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 886 F.2d 1316 (6th Cir. 1989) Oct. 5, 1989

Before WELLFORD and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff appeals from the order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's Memorandum and Order of December 23, 1988, with the exception of that court's discussion concerning reduction in work force, as we need not reach that issue.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.