United States of America, Respondent, v. Keith Anthony Campbell, Petitioner, 885 F.2d 866 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 885 F.2d 866 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted May 31, 1989. Decided Sept. 18, 1989

Keith Anthony Campbell, Petitioner.

Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Keith A. Campbell, who is presently incarcerated in a federal prison outside the jurisdiction of this Court, has petitioned this Court for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Campbell attacks his conviction of mail fraud, claiming that his attorney induced him to plead guilty by misadvising him regarding the sentence he would receive, his eligibility for parole, and the prosecutor's silence at sentencing. He also claims that his sentence was based on inaccurate information in his presentence report and that he has been selectively prosecuted. Nearly all these claims have been determined adversely to Campbell in the district court, and the district court's determination affirmed on appeal. See United States v. Campbell, No. 87-7720 (4th Cir. Mar. 25, 1988) (unpublished); United States v. Campbell, No. 88-6053 (4th Cir. Jan. 26, 1989) (unpublished); United States v. Campbell, No. 88-7225 (4th Cir. Apr. 7, 1989) (unpublished); United States v. Campbell, No. 87-7745 (4th Cir. Apr. 7, 1989) (unpublished). Thus, although we have the authority, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, to transfer this action to a court having jurisdiction--that court being the district court acting under 28 U.S.C. § 2255--we decline to do so in view of the repetitive nature of the claims.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.