Roger Hohl, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Darlene T. Hohl, Defendant-appellee, 884 F.2d 1388 (4th Cir. 1989)

Roger Hohl appeals the district court's dismissal of his civil rights suit seeking to set aside a state-court judgment against him for child-support arrearages. As explained by the district court, the federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review state-court judgments. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hohl v. Hohl, C/A No. 89-523-S (D. Md. Feb. 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the appeal is frivolous. Mr. Hohl is admonished that sanctions may be imposed against him should he continue to press his frivolous claims in the federal courts.

AFFIRMED.