In Re Lynwood James Daye, Jr., Petitioner, 884 F.2d 1387 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseLynwood James Daye, Jr., Petitioner pro se.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Lynwood James Daye, Jr., petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus, complaining of the district court's actions in Daye v. Bumgarner, C/A No. 87-845-C-R (M.D.N.C.). As that action has now been dismissed, an appeal is the proper vehicle for challenging the district court's actions in that case. Cf. In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979) (mandamus should not be a substitute for an appeal). Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition.
PETITION DENIED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
