United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Thomas James Morgan, A/k/a James T. Bailey, Defendant-appellant, 883 F.2d 70 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseThomas James Morgan, appellant pro se.
William Anthony Kolibash, Office of the United States Attorney) for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas James Morgan appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Morgan, CR No. 84-2-E; C/A No. 89-48-E-(K) (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 3, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Morgan's assertion that his attorney was ineffective for not raising what we find to be a meritless double jeopardy claim fails
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
