Erwin Donnell Bullock, Petitioner-appellant, v. Samuel L. Batts, Superintendent; Mary Sue Terry, Attorneygeneral of Virginia, Respondents-appellees, 883 F.2d 68 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseErwin Donnell Bullock, appellant pro se.
Robert H. Anderson, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Erwin Bullock seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.* Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Bullock v. Batts, C/A-88-38-R (E.D. Va. May 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
